NOTICE OF CONVENING FY-12 PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL (OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT) AND ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY SELECTION BOARD

UNCLASSIFIED//

RTTUZYUW RHSSXYZ0001 0471303-UUUU--RHSSSUU
ZNR UUUUU
R 161701Z FEB 11
FM CNO WASHINGTON DC
TO AL NAVADMIN
NAVADMIN
INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC
BT
UNCLAS
PASS TO ALL OFFICE CODES:
FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1//
TO NAVADMIN
INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1//

NAVADMIN 054/11

MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/FEB// 

SUBJ/NOTICE OF CONVENING FY-12 PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE 
GENERAL (OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT) AND ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL 
OF THE NAVY SELECTION BOARD// 



RMKS/1.  THIS NAVADMIN ANNOUNCES THE NOTICE OF CONVENING DATE FOR 
SUBJECT SELECTION BOARD AS 25 MARCH 2011.  THE FOLLOWING LIST INDICATES 
THE NAME, ACTIVE-DUTY LIST NUMBER, AND DATE OF RANK OF THE SENIOR AND 
JUNIOR OFFICERS ON THE ACTIVE DUTY LIST IN THE COMPETITIVE CATEGORY OF 
NAVY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S CORPS, WHO ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONSIDERATION 
AS OF THE DATE OF THIS NAVADMIN.

SENIOR ELIGIBLE - GAASCH, C. J.       010102-50    1 DEC 2001
JUNIOR ELIGIBLE - LEECH, D. W.        011062-50    1 JAN 2008

2.  ONLY ELIGIBLE OFFICERS MAY COMMUNICATE WITH A SELECTION BOARD.
ALL CORRESPONDENCE MUST ARRIVE NOT LATER THAN THE CONVENING DATE OF THE 
BOARD AND SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO:
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND (NPC) CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER PRESIDENT, FY-12 
ACTIVE DUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY SELECTION BOARD 
#109 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON, TN 38055 THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 
MAY CALL TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BOARD INFORMATION THE OFFICER CONSIDERS 
RELEVANT.  THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION MAY INCLUDE, AS ENCLOSURES, 
CORRESPONDENCE FROM ANY INDIVIDUAL CONCERNING THE ELIGIBLE OFFICER.  
CORRESPONDENCE NOT ORIGINATED BY THE ELIGIBLE OFFICER, INCLUDING 
ENDORSEMENTS TO THE OFFICER'S LETTER AND LETTERS WRITTEN ON BEHALF OF 
THAT OFFICER, MUST CONTAIN A WRITTEN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY THE ELIGIBLE 
OFFICER THAT HE OR SHE DESIRES SUCH CORRESPONDENCE BE PRESENTED TO THE 
BOARD.  CORRESPONDENCE WITHOUT SUCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS CONSIDERED THIRD 
PARTY CORRESPONDENCE AND WILL BE RETURNED. CLASSIFIED CORRESPONDENCE 
WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

3.  ELIGIBLE OFFICERS NOT WANTING TO BE CONSIDERED BY THIS BOARD MAY 
SUBMIT A REQUEST INDICATING THE DESIRE THAT THEIR RECORD NOT BE 
CONSIDERED.  OFFICERS SUBMITTING REQUESTS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED WILL NOT 
BE ELIGIBLE AND THEIR RECORDS WILL NOT BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR 
CONSIDERATION.

4.  THE FOLLOWING OFFICERS ARE NOT ELIGIBLE AND THEIR RECORDS WILL NOT 
BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION:  ANY OFFICER WHO HAS AN 
APPROVED SEPARATION/RETIREMENT DATE AS OF THE CONVENING DATE OF THE 
BOARD; OR WAS RECOMMENDED BY A PREVIOUS SELECTION BOARD FOR APPOINTMENT 
AS ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY OR LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE 
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF (PURSUANT TO SECTION 156 OF TITLE 
10 U.S. CODE).

5.  RELEASED BY VADM MARK FERGUSON, N1.

BT
#0001
NNNN

%d bloggers like this: